原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-15 10:31 發表


to get the photo u want, u need to understand ur tools on ur hands.


我意思係了解都有好多方式, 唔一定數理化咁了解,

可以從感覺去了解佢既特性, 咁都可以係一種了解。

TOP

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 10:40 發表


我意思係了解都有好多方式, 唔一定數理化咁了解,

可以從感覺去了解佢既特性, 咁都可以係一種了解。

attributes of the equipment affect the output...
you can feel and purchase but the purchase may not be as good as you felt...

TOP

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 10:43 發表

attributes of the equipment affect the output...
you can feel and purchase but the purchase may not be as good as you felt...


should be the outputs maybe not be as good as when u feel the body :P.. haha

TOP

呢個post越講越遠...
本來想講下OM有何特別,
依家就變成OM既特別之處就係冇咩特別.....

TOP

原帖由 toracat 於 2008-10-15 11:18 發表
呢個post越講越遠...
本來想講下OM有何特別,
依家就變成OM既特別之處就係冇咩特別.....

for me, 4/3 system is relatively smaller DSLR...

TOP

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 10:43 發表

attributes of the equipment affect the output...
you can feel and purchase but the purchase may not be as good as you felt...


你咁諗又未免太過器材主義la,

如果你既出品係表達感覺, 咁任何野都可以表達, 就算一支筆畫畫, 就算用電腦畫., 講近d, 現今各dslr, 講真有咩野係影唔到呢? 上面所講既低光拍攝, 4/3都可以, 一樣好有feel.

TOP

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 11:57 發表

for me, 4/3 system is relatively smaller DSLR...


for me, smaller size is not my concern.
i like om because of the color tone.

TOP

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 12:46 發表


你咁諗又未免太過器材主義la,

如果你既出品係表達感覺, 咁任何野都可以表達, 就算一支筆畫畫, 就算用電腦畫., 講近d, 現今各dslr, 講真有咩野係影唔到呢? 上面所講既低光拍攝, 4/3都可以, 一樣好有feel.

if the object you want to shoot is static or in bright light, it works...
if you want to shoot something moving in low light while you want to freeze it... you need better equipments...

TOP

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 12:59 發表

if the object you want to shoot is static or in bright light, it works...
if you want to shoot something moving in low light while you want to freeze it... you need better equipments...


agree, but i cant afford this

TOP

原帖由 hkepckk 於 2008-10-15 13:03 發表


agree, but i cant afford this



haha you may need a better 視野 first.

TOP