HenryxHenry

please see

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=575389&extra=page%3D1

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=573221&extra=page%3D2

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=574282&extra=page%3D1

HenryxHenry

原帖由 toracat 於 2008-10-15 09:51 發表


Reporters D 器材係呀公架麻..價錢吾係一個考慮因素..
我諗用過OM既人都知OM有好多缺點, 但佢都有可取既地方..
每個品牌都有強弱, 就算CN亦然

完全agree

inzite

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 09:56 發表



完全agree

i agree that om's advtange is the lower cost compared to maybe high end nikon or canon gear. but i just find it funny that some people praise om just because they chase the brand like a cult.

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 09:54 發表
please see

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=575389&extra=page%3D1

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=573221&extra=page%3D2

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=574282&extra=page%3D1

LOL... it can freeze action but... do you find it really good?...
see the color... that's BETTER OM color?
i think the color maybe degraded by the color noise...

inzite

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 09:54 發表
please see

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=575389&extra=page%3D1

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=573221&extra=page%3D2

http://www.dc屋.net/viewthread.php?tid=574282&extra=page%3D1

oo so i went to all three links, also looked at exif for link 1 and 2.. iso 400 at f2 with shutter 1/800 to 1/1000 is not really wat i would call low light.. link 3 is not really freezing action but rather panning.. yes panning is great but it doens't show ur point.

inzite

this is wat i called low light
iso 6400, f2.8, 1/800


iso 6400, f2.8, 1/1000


iso3200, f1.4, 1/80


iso 1600, f1.2, 1/15


iso3200, f1.2, 1/640


iso3200, f1.2, 1/125


iso8000, f2.8, 1/40


[ 本帖最後由 inzite 於 2008-10-15 10:20 編輯 ]

HenryxHenry

原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-15 09:58 發表


i agree that om's advtange is the lower cost compared to maybe high end nikon or canon gear. but i just find it funny that some people praise om just because they chase the brand like a cult.

尼d野每個brand都有啦, 有幾多人真係了解個系統而買?

不過反轉諗, 其實只focus係output-即係出尼既相, 而唔需要確切了解部相機, 會唔會咁先係好呢?

inzite

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 10:29 發表


尼d野每個brand都有啦, 有幾多人真係了解個系統而買?

不過反轉諗, 其實只focus係output-即係出尼既相, 而唔需要確切了解部相機, 會唔會咁先係好呢?

to get the photo u want, u need to understand ur tools on ur hands.

HenryxHenry

原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-15 10:12 發表
this is wat i called low light
iso 6400, f2.8, 1/800
?v=0

iso 6400, f2.8, 1/1000
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2132/2189688040_22af8d0aec ...

HAHA, Olympus can do noting in "no" light  LA

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 10:29 發表


尼d野每個brand都有啦, 有幾多人真係了解個系統而買?

不過反轉諗, 其實只focus係output-即係出尼既相, 而唔需要確切了解部相機, 會唔會咁先係好呢?

for beginners, it's right, as they don't know how to choose...
after using for a while and understanding the features and limitation of their equipments, they would try to understand more before further purchase or even switch to other systems...