initials

原帖由 kowloon 於 2008-10-14 11:42 發表
色水的比較都是較主觀的... 但一般來說, 人們都認為OM直出JPG的色要比較好!!

不是CAN0N不好, 只是要用RAW或後製

shooting jpg simply applies some post processing to the image on camera bodies (the saturation, contrast ...etc setting)
i don't deny canon's default setting has lower contrast/saturation but it leaves you more room for post processing, jpg with high contrast preserves relatively less detail... some OM users claim that it is easy to be over because of the high contrast default setting...
if you need colorful direct jpg output from canon, you can simply set it in picture style... you can find its color is not worse than OM's

小康

原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-14 11:22 發表


olddo 好特別mei? 小弟新手一名。

大大  我才是新手一名吧

olddo老師在O記界頗有名的   在台也有開班授課

inzite

原帖由 小康 於 2008-10-14 11:57 發表


大大  我才是新手一名吧

olddo老師在O記界頗有名的   在台也有開班授課

ooo first time hearing.

kowloon

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-14 11:52 發表

shooting jpg simply applies some post processing to the image on camera bodies (the saturation, contrast ...etc setting)
i don't deny canon's default setting has lower contrast/saturation but it leav ...

if someone gonna PP, he must use RAW, in this situation, I don't see any different btw OM/Can0n as both of them contain the same "raw" information from CCD.
(in short, the raw information from Can0n's CMOS did not contain more information then another brand's CCD/CMOS)

So the way Can0n's default is lower contrast / saturation did not leave "more" head room for PP.

initials

原帖由 kowloon 於 2008-10-14 13:29 發表



if someone gonna PP, he must use RAW, in this situation, I don't see any different btw OM/Can0n as both of them contain the same "raw" information from CCD.
(in short, the raw information from Can ...

LOL... please read my reply carefully...
"jpg with high contrast preserves relatively less detail"
if shooting raw, you can change such attributes as you like without degrading the image quality...
the BETTER color of OM is just because the DEFAULT SETTING is more vivid for direct JPG output only...
maybe, i am a new hand, you think i don't understand... haha
anyway, each brand's sensors and lens groups have their characteristics...
it's difficult to say one is better than another...
"咁如果唔比較FPS, OM的入門機 D 色都靚過CAN0N機王啦"
i can't agree with it...

[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-14 14:25 編輯 ]

toracat

我又吾覺得C記D相detail過O記喎...

initials

原帖由 toracat 於 2008-10-14 16:29 發表
我又吾覺得C記D相detail過O記喎...

LOL, PUSH CONTRAST AND YOU WILL SEE DETAIL IS LOST

toracat

推contrast lost detail 我都知..
我係話om直出jpg D相我吾覺得detail會比C記少

Tef

我覺得佢地d機真係為一樣野而設   
影動物
點解?
細sensor:
crop factor大 乘出尼倍數高
sensor細, 同一focal length, 鏡可以細d,  外出一流
sensor細, 低光noise多但預你日光日白去影郊外 所以無問題
防水防塵 去到非洲都唔係問題
晒到行反差大但OM 藍無乜問題

inzite

原帖由 Tef 於 2008-10-15 01:03 發表
我覺得佢地d機真係為一樣野而設   
影動物
點解?
細sensor:
crop factor大 乘出尼倍數高
sensor細, 同一focal length, 鏡可以細d,  外出一流
sensor細, 低光noise多但預你日光日白去影郊外 所以無問題
防水防塵 去到非洲都唔係問題
晒到行反差大但OM 藍無乜問題

for most of the wildlife, they start their activity in the early or late hrs of the day. not in the middle of the day. so u need high iso performance.