calvin83

一早用呢條咪得囉,奸狼點做野?
必思 發表於 2016-9-9 14:20

E條夠絕, 基本上係乜得反擊.

ytlcys

買咗佢地嘅行貨產品真係自己搵自己笨

必思

E條夠絕, 基本上係乜得反擊.
calvin83 發表於 2016-9-9 14:21

    Acts of God

必思

買咗佢地嘅行貨產品真係自己搵自己笨
ytlcys 發表於 2016-9-9 14:35

呢度好多奸狼用家

ytlcys

回覆 34# 必思

我都係奸狼用家
事實唔怕講

calvin83

買咗佢地嘅行貨產品真係自己搵自己笨
ytlcys 發表於 2016-9-9 14:35

買多份保險.

pc1668

回覆 1# ytlcys

睇番8(e), 基本上咩相機 sensor入塵都唔保, 無論入塵係點樣做成ge.
calvin83 發表於 2016-9-9 14:15

"8(e), 基本上咩相機 sensor入塵都唔保, 無論入塵係點樣做成ge"
Then this is company policy, no surprise, but quite disappointed!

Anyway, I've the following repair experience regarding dust issue for sharing.

1. Panasonic
I've a hong good GM1 (with 12-32 kit) that was suffering from dust issue on the sensor and lens (inside the rear element).  Shun Hing helped to clean the sensor (by removing several dust specks, so it should be a dry clean only).  Then dismantled the rear element of the kit lens and removed the dust speck.  They told me the warranty includes dust removal (sure free of charge) ... pretty good company!

2.  Sony
I had a hong good Sony DC (long ago) that was suffering from dust issue on the very internal of its non-removable zoom.  As the lens was non-repairable (cannot be dismantled), Sony replaced the zoom lens unit free of charge.

My last Canon DC was G9, after encountering the sensor banding issue (non-usable right after warranty expiry), no 'look back' for their products any more.  How can we accept a DC (sure not cheap) that would only last for 1 year and 1 month!

Not to mention I was also a 1 series user (long ago) ... already switched to rivals for years

99% of my photographic equipments are hong good for the sake of original manufacturer warranty.  For OP's case, it's pretty pathethic !

manman1998

依度好多 反C 既會員就真

pc1668

上回舊文
已經去信消委會投訴，得到嘅回覆係
維修人員盡力協助清除鏡頭內之微塵，不過鏡頭內仍然有微塵難 ...
ytlcys 發表於 2016-9-2 13:23

It is very disappointed !

pc1668

咁易入塵！可能係設計問題！？
aichun 發表於 2016-9-2 19:39

sure it's a design flaw