ALLEX

A16有覺得sharp小小,最小要收到f4

westkenny

之前用咗A16 1Week(放咗),A16有偏色see pic post 17#,同原廠比更嚴重,加480/540EXII Bonus仲偏得跨, 轉咗Sigma 18-50/f2.8 marco ex就正常哂!

[ 本帖最後由 westkenny 於 2008-10-10 07:58 編輯 ]

AAA1

Right, the colour of A16 looks too brilliant. There is also focusing problem once in a while. And other website test revealed the focus plane is not flat but a curve instead. So it is normal for it to be blurred at corner, but sometime one side is more in focus than the other side. It is a weird len.
The other new purchase Tamron len I get is 90mm macro, another weird len with focusing problem, and showing vessels underneath skin on portrait.

inzite

u need to try a 24-70 nikon or 24-70 canon to feel the difference.

AAA1

http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/ ... 750_28_sony?start=1
see a review for alpha mount

lsman1

原帖由 AAA1 於 2008-10-10 08:25 發表
showing vessels underneath skin on portrait...

Blood...Run!...

AAA1

I agree with you that the focus depth seems too shallow for A16 compared to other old SLR lens I get.
For 90mm macro, the len just exaggerate any defect you can find on portrait. Even a small flake of skin piece is revealed. I suppose the len is sensitive to infra red so that superficial vessels become more prominent.

ahshing

原帖由 AAA1 於 2008-10-10 08:25 發表
Right, the colour of A16 looks too brilliant. There is also focusing problem once in a while. And other website test revealed the focus plane is not flat but a curve instead. So it is normal for it to ...

你覺得太鮮?我覺得太灰wor

lsman1

I think the color is more "pink"....

lsman1

for what it forth...outside shot


F10 1/80s


f5.6 1/250s



f5.6 1/50s


f5.6 1/100s



a bit soft on edge...
f2.8 no use under sun light...
it will match with 1/1250s and the image will be blur on far object..