HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-16 09:11 發表
i forgot to bring CPL

haha, c記係要有方法先可以好似你咁直出GA, 如果你真係直出的話.
如果唔係...一般人冇認真SET過機玩C記係絕對唔可能直出, 明唔明?
我都玩過冇特別SET過野既C記機, 出尼係同你唔同LOR.

而O記機直出既意思, 係唔需要用家特別去搞部機, 都出到靚相.  同你所講既機身直出有少少分別.

所以我會叫新手入OM, 而玩多左就轉lor.

HenryxHenry

原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-16 07:57 發表
i really don't see how OM blue can't be achieved other than shooting om cams. this one is a canon raw -> jpg directly

?v=0

尼張就好有c記色彩素雅平實既風格, 我信尼張係 raw -> jpg,   不過唔係om blue lor

zeroken

只要天氣好.個天本身藍.咩機都唔會太差
SONY A300+ KIT沒CPL


如果個天灰.,咩機都係唔藍

[ 本帖最後由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 14:27 編輯 ]

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-16 14:03 發表


haha, c記係要有方法先可以好似你咁直出GA, 如果你真係直出的話.
如果唔係...一般人冇認真SET過機玩C記係絕對唔可能直出, 明唔明?
我都玩過冇特別SET過野既C記機, 出尼係同你唔同LOR.

而O記機直出既意思, 係唔需要用家特別去搞部機, 都出到靚相.  同你所講既機身直出有少少分別.

所以我會叫新手入OM, 而玩多左就轉lor.

第一, 鏡頭對色彩好有影響, 玩過L鏡你就知D色係好靚...
第二, 我都講過係OM default contrast同saturation set得高所以你會覺得顏色鮮艷, 要直出jpeg, 0係picture style度set番高saturation/contrast唔會差得過OM, 影RAW, 呢D參數番屋企SET都得, 講真, 玩得單鏡好心唔好當部機係傻瓜機, 影出黎唔靚又話部機D色唔靚, 查實自己唔好好運用佢有0既設定... 講真我唔覺得OM 一個default setting可以影得晒所有野都有最好效果... 要影得好一樣要fine tune一下果d attributes

[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-16 14:36 編輯 ]

zeroken

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-16 07:36 發表

high ISO performance is really a major point for user to consider before purchase... (maybe just me)
one of the reason people don't buy OM is lack of FF sensor and poor high iso performance...
if OM  ...

OK.ISO  performance ISO performance ISO ISO..AGAIN AND AGAIN
THEN 個個要買D3.THEN個個要買FF機
我沒講過OM用色水做賣點,唔該你睇清楚我講咩

zeroken

成個POST 9成係度講ISO.同色.
4/3特點.直射入光.減黑角.最強機身防震.除塵.反反MON.全部都唔係優點
但得高ISO 表現可以討論.唔通睇SPEC買機睇ISO就夠?.懶得回了.我講咩都係翻翻去ISO.晒GAS

initials

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 14:35 發表

OK.ISO  performance ISO performance ISO ISO..AGAIN AND AGAIN
THEN 個個要買D3.THEN個個要買FF機
我沒講過OM用色水做賣點,唔該你睇清楚我講咩

i am not claiming you but other ching's comments...
not all the people would buy serious users would have such consideration...
that's why people would think the top class DC lens like EFS 17-55 and 17-55 DX doesn't worth the price as they are not FF lens...
yup, you are right, we are talking about olympus in this thread, so my impression on OM is small DSLR and poorer low light performance... any problem?

zeroken

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-16 14:42 發表

i am not claiming you but other ching's comments...
not all the people would buy serious users would have such consideration...
that's why people would think the top class DC lens like EFS 17-55 and  ...

如果我係新手.我只會覺得呢個POST只不過係討論緊ISO 表現.低光表現.我真係睇唔出呢個POST係講緊OLYMPUS有咩特別之處..或者OLYMPUS特別之處就係高ISO表現特別差

initials

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 14:42 發表
成個POST 9成係度講ISO.同色.
4/3特點.直射入光.減黑角.最強機身防震.除塵.反反MON.全部都唔係優點
但得高ISO 表現可以討論.唔通睇SPEC買機睇ISO就夠?.懶得回了.我講咩都係翻翻去ISO.晒GAS

the vignette can be easily corrected, even such function is embed to camera bodies now.
and actually, the sensor is smaller, if the image circle is not that small, there should be no vignette... just like using FF lens on APSC bodies LOL... nowaday each system has IS/VR/SR function... you can say it's the best on the body... but doesn't have the advantages of IS/VR on lens... the flipping mon... does A350 have it?... and actually, i am typical DSLR user... i use optical VF in most case unless... i am unable to see the view finder but... i wonder how often i meet this case... 1%? maybe lower...
dust removal, just see where you live in... in asia, the dust is so sticky, even you have blower, you can't blow it out... finally, you need to clean the sensor...
you can say the features are good, but not that exclusive...

[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-16 15:02 編輯 ]

initials

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 14:47 發表

如果我係新手.我只會覺得呢個POST只不過係討論緊ISO 表現.低光表現.我真係睇唔出呢個POST係講緊OLYMPUS有咩特別之處..或者OLYMPUS特別之處就係高ISO表現特別差

yup, i did say it is small DSLR... very handy especially using e-4xx with the new pancake lens

[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-16 15:05 編輯 ]