HenryxHenry

再尼e-500 iso1600爆noise相

inzite

oo btw people, shooting high iso will have less noise in a brighter scene than one of a darker scene. listing pure iso has no meaning, list ur shutter speed and aperture as well.

HenryxHenry

原帖由 inzite 於 2008-10-16 02:44 發表
oo btw people, shooting high iso will have less noise in a brighter scene than one of a darker scene. listing pure iso has no meaning, list ur shutter speed and aperture as well.

  iso640-1600, f1.4-2.8, 1/5- 1/250

zeroken

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-16 02:30 發表

u sure?

all by iso 800 ~ 3200
?v=0

?v=0

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/315 ...

點睇都唔似直出啦

HenryxHenry

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 02:54 發表

點睇都唔似直出啦

咁又唔好咁以為, 如果c記入啱左pic style 加上識set機影相都可以一take過,

zeroken

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-16 02:56 發表


咁又唔好咁以為, 如果c記入啱左pic style 加上識set機影相都可以一take過,

4邊失光效果.......ㄧ睇就知沒可能直出

initials

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-10-16 02:58 發表

4邊失光效果.......ㄧ睇就知沒可能直出

i just add vignette to the photos but not changing the color
canon's color really that bad? huh?

find some without vignette... or you may say i have a signature, impossible to be direct export...



















[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-16 07:24 編輯 ]

HenryxHenry

滿足下大家對e-3 noise 既 疑問,

e-3+30mm ,  iso 3200 , 1/80 , f1.4

直出, wow"好多noise ar


之後係ps下


當然細節冇左好多lu, haha如果影人唔洗執lu,  haha.

zeroken

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-16 02:30 發表

u sure?

all by iso 800 ~ 3200
?v=0

特別呢張..好明顯PS過

kalok.wong

OM用家最常聽到這些三幅被既批評,這點反而可能係新手唔入OM既最大原因.....
這個post都無人去話canon唔好,只係賣花讚花香一下,但現在卻變成批評OM缺點,大讚canon優點,無奈