小康

相比較下... 高ISO/NOISE問題... 的確是OM的相對弱項

再就這點爭論落去  也是沒完沒了

toracat

原帖由 小康 於 2008-10-15 16:06 發表
相比較下... 高ISO/NOISE問題... 的確是OM的相對弱項

再就這點爭論落去  也是沒完沒了

高ISO/NOISE問題....Sony同OM暫時都未及CN...
呢個好多人都知, 吾須要爭論
Sony, Pentax同OM 都有各自特點係其他冇, 所以先可以生存.
吾同機fit吾同人...對我黎講OM最岩我...that's it!!

HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 15:47 發表

the point is OM's low light performance is really worse than C/N...
a picture with less noise is more welcomed than one with more noise...
you can easily add some noise to it, but difficult to reduce ...

你的意思是愈來人認同就是愈好, 而你亦喜好這種"跟潮流"??


難怪香港都市的藝術水平一直是這樣了,

HenryxHenry

原帖由 小康 於 2008-10-15 16:06 發表
相比較下... 高ISO/NOISE問題... 的確是OM的相對弱項

再就這點爭論落去  也是沒完沒了

haha, 每次一講om...4/3, 永遠只有尼個話題,

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 17:23 發表


你的意思是愈來人認同就是愈好, 而你亦喜好這種"跟潮流"??


難怪香港都市的藝術水平一直是這樣了,

it's not following the trend but image with less noise is more flexible...
we are trying to have as less noise as possible... anybody steps down and use ISO1600 in day time to obtain the noise or oil paint?... i guess no much people would do so always...
if noise is not a problem, why the company spend so much to develop better sensor and processor to produce image with less noise?
by the way, why not showing us some of your high iso great work by OM? huh?

[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-15 17:32 編輯 ]

HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 17:28 發表

it's not following the trend but image with less noise is more flexible...
we are trying to have as less noise as possible... anybody steps down and use ISO1600 in day time to obtain the noise or oil ...

靚相就冇啦, high iso 既noise and oil paint 相就有d

thk17

O記 好似唔夠N, C牌多鏡GA可?

HenryxHenry

e-500+30/1.4  iso1600, nr off

haha超粗粒粒

initials

so... what do you want to express with the noise? is it better than less noise?

hkepckk

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 17:42 發表
e-500+30/1.4  iso1600, nr off

haha超粗粒粒

死喇, 我覺得接受到喎, 最多加一野neatimage