That is not a correct comparison.

User still pay same amount for a entry level computer set at al ...
domeso 發表於 2015-7-26 13:38


笑左!你咁講MTV隻大牛龜加陳年晶片應該賣幾錢??

TOP

其實 XBMC, MythTV 個類軟件如果做得好,可否取代 MTV?
thomasc5 發表於 2015-7-25 17:43

將XBMC, MythTV入面大部分普通人用唔着嘅function cut晒佢,將佢轉到簡單易用就得。但咁樣做,佢地全強大之處就冇咗,同埋你嘅反應可以會係“點解同MTV一樣嘅“

via HKEPC Reader for Android

TOP

笑左!你咁講MTV隻大牛龜加陳年晶片應該賣幾錢??
cyleung19 發表於 2015-7-26 15:35



    Sorry, I do not get which part was funny.

What I mean is, user pays almost same for a new set top box to fit their needs as 10 years ago, and there is nothing wrong for manufacturer to sell them as same price.

of coz one can go Ap Liu street and buy a second hand Magic TV and it work "almost" the same as the new ones at much cheaper cost (I personally do that, most of my MTVs are second hand repaired, I only ever paid for a couple first hand ones from Broadway).

The $1xxx not only comes with the HW, but the software that comes with it, the warranty (which some user already mention they were not very good).

Yes HW price dropped, MTV did improved their chipsets and tuners, not significant but they did (menu are faster with faster CPU, tuner were more stable), they learnt their lessons and changed the PSU/Remote sources, they provided update firmware to bug fix, support new function to their products (HKTV support, MHEG5 support) (which tho, I think they can do better on their firmware, look at the hacking MagicTV post).

MTV did sell something improved other than same HW 10 years back, like Apple was selling an Apple II 30 years back and Mac mini now at almost same price.

All I was trying to point out is, things don't fall down from the sky, try to appreciate what engineer make and it is not an easy job.

Someone thinks a $1xxx set top box is very expensive, someone else thinks it is fair,  someone go for second hand $2xx ones which still works well, there is no right or wrong.

The fact is, user pay for what they think is worth and they are still buying it, the need and demand is still there (given almost ALL newer TV comes with basic recording functions), no doubt MTV did a great job and some user would still like to pay for.

I do not work at /for MTV, but I appreciate their local development, and I do enjoy their UX of the product.

TOP

買左用緊
真心好用!

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

但是我家中為例,8000D反而熱過7000D。

TOP

我個部 mtv3000用到而家都未壞

(Sent from EPC Pocket iPhone app)

TOP

.....ISO 國際保養條例...... 真有其事? 願師兄講解一下好嗎? 謝謝!
simontang 發表於 2015-7-25 21:00



有! 其中一條喺: 就算你個產品停產, 自停產日,工廠必須要保持最少5年  spare parts for that particular product!當然, 唔喺所有公司都有本事做得到! 尤其喺啲細公司!

TOP

本帖最後由 CMZ 於 2015-7-27 21:57 編輯

回覆 98# 清明上河圖

留 5年 parts, 好似有啲天方夜譚
咁如果真係用晒,唔通真係要特登訂過啲 parts 為咗整翻一隻停產嘅產品?
仲未計放咗 5年啲 parts 仲用唔用得,有冇生銹
唔知有冇真實個案?

TOP

本帖最後由 清明上河圖 於 2015-7-28 00:40 編輯

回覆 99# CMZ

當公司嘅產品平均有 90% margin 時候, 有幾天方夜譚呢?  

唔好再問喇! 喺有咁嘅條例, 不過做唔到唔駛死, 好似香港消費條例也話明,唔需要任何原因都可以退貨, 外國得,點解香港唔得?

TOP