[Anandtech] AMD Server Market 強敵 - Nehalem based Xeon

dom

http://it.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3484&p=1

睇數據 , Shanghai (45nm Opteron ) Vs 當代 Xeon  重有得打
Virtualization 比起 65nm Opteron 有進步添 , 不過 如果對 翻  Nehalem 架構 既 Xeon  應該好難打

....What do we learn from this overview? The new quad-core Opteron 2384 or 8384 is a success. It's a late success, but it can keep its most important competitor at a tangible distance in ERP, OLAP, and HPC. For ERP, OLTP, and OLAP, we are pretty sure our benchmarks give a good view. SAP, Oracle, and MySQL are very popular applications each in their own field, and the SQL server results of our "AMD Opteron Shanghai" review show more or less the same picture. In these markets, it will be hard to find benchmarks that contradict our findings

好在重有d market 有優勢

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2008-12-28 18:47 編輯 ]

G-核戰機

AMD唔係低階市場咩?
高階仲有市場已經是好好啦

最賺錢都是高階市場,一粒U賣8K就8K,賺左起碼4K~5K

低階賺得幾十有咩用

[N.H.K]anime

原帖由 G-核戰機 於 2008-12-29 23:53 發表
AMD唔係低階市場咩?
高階仲有市場已經是好好啦

最賺錢都是高階市場,一粒U賣8K就8K,賺左起碼4K~5K

低階賺得幾十有咩用

需然係幾十....只要好超..周圍既人就會買...唔同server一買就萬粒咁.....
普通市民買既數量點都比server級為多吧....
有錯指證

wmkmws

desktop phenomII對virtualization ge optimization會唔會差好多

姆明先生

香港全CG製作公司 i記(585)上年都買左2000粒

dom

原帖由 wmkmws 於 30-12-2008 12:25 AM 發表
desktop phenomII對virtualization ge optimization會唔會差好多

Phenom II 比 Phenom 係 VT 都有進步 啦
Intel 依家 同 Phenom 同價有 VT 加速既 得 Q6600 / E8
VT 加速技術 連 Microsoft 都加左 Hyper-V 去 Server 2008
有無用大可以放長雙眼睇

wmkmws

原帖由 dom 於 2008-12-31 18:57 發表


Phenom II 比 Phenom 係 VT 都有進步 啦
Intel 依家 同 Phenom 同價有 VT 加速既 得 Q6600 / E8
VT 加速技術 連 Microsoft 都加左 Hyper-V 去 Server 2008
有無用大可以放長雙眼睇

l3 cache對virtualization幫助大唔大

dom

原帖由 wmkmws 於 31-12-2008 10:59 PM 發表

l3 cache對virtualization幫助大唔大

http://it.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3484&p=9
Thanks to the lower world switch times, higher clock speed, and larger cache, the new "Shanghai" Opteron 8384 improves the already impressive scores of the AMD "Barcelona" 8356 by almost 43%.

有幫助 , 高頻 , 大 L3 幫到手

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2009-1-1 01:46 編輯 ]