Antec CA-300分享

見咁多ching分享自已既機箱照我又貼下
無開孔改所以線無得走後面
算執得ok嗎?比下意見交流下

b196860844.jpg (122.52 KB)

b196860844.jpg

OK WOR...
有D似590

TOP

原帖由 aR_man 於 2009-7-17 22:51 發表
OK WOR...
有D似590

D空間少好多

TOP

原帖由 Inspire 於 2009-7-17 22:53 發表

D空間少好多

size and interior space is nearly the same as 590 and 690

[ 本帖最後由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:05 編輯 ]

TOP

回覆 4# 的帖子

no kidding please

TOP

45.8 (H) x 46.5 (D) x 20.5 cm (W) for CA-300
(W) 210 x (H) 440 x (D)510 mm for 590

ca 300 is higher, nearly the same (W), only shorter that 590 4.5cm.
the different is not much, at least I can put 4890 inside easily

I'm not kidding, I put three of them side by side before I bought it

[ 本帖最後由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:41 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:05 發表

size and interior space is nearly the same as 590 and 690

差好遠
AND
ca300 自已友 但係無影相
執線執得唔太靚 好難執

TOP

really a BIG different?
the official given size no. is fake? I don't think so

they only got 4.5cm in different, with higher height and nearly the same (W)

[ 本帖最後由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:44 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:43 發表
really a BIG different?
the official given size no. is fake? I don't think so

計落差唔多,,但係用落點都睇落係ca300 細d

TOP

I think it's because the interior design...no holds for wire to go around, so people may think it's smaller

another reason is...$399vs$480

[ 本帖最後由 pakcheongkwan 於 2009-7-17 23:47 編輯 ]

TOP