Board logo

標題: [轉貼]i7 920 vs QX9650生死決戰 [打印本頁]

作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 09:28     標題: [轉貼]i7 920 vs QX9650生死決戰

i7  920


QX9650


滄者.........i7強戰

I7 920勝

再黎i7 965 vs QX9650
Conclusion

The new Core i7 965 is a formidable chip out performing the QX9650 in every area of the benchmark testing. However a cautionary note is that the i7 uses the faster DDR3 rams and this allows for a higher RAM frequency.

Overclocking the Core i7 965 has a variety of new options to tweak like, QPI frequency and other voltages. This gives the end user more settings to tweak and master where you may be able to squeeze even more out the the Core i7 965.

Reaching 4.0GHz was easily accomplished by either processor but since there is familiarity with the QX9650 we need to take our time exploring and familiarising ourselves with the BIOS options. A simply detail like 'multiplier' needed to be accounted for and is known as 'ratio' for the Core i7 965.

If you were to purchase a new setup today the new Core i7 965 setup would be preferred over the older QX9650 but this conclusion is based solely on a synthetic benchmark. We have yet to see and experience real world usage on a long term basis. Stay tuned as we continue to put the Core i7 965 through additional tests.

好快就黎有i7玩...其實i7 920令人期待既感覺就好似玩E6300年代咁..

[ 本帖最後由 SamLo仔 於 2008-11-13 10:47 編輯 ]
作者: rayshun    時間: 2008-11-13 09:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: zonebaby    時間: 2008-11-13 10:04

似乎都係轉i7好過買粒QX!
作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 10:19

轉i7..成本比...QX9650仲要低..

一粒新QX9650 = i7 940 + X58
作者: taihung    時間: 2008-11-13 10:22

原帖由 SamLo仔 於 2008-11-13 09:28 發表
好快就黎有i7玩...其實i7 920令人期待既感覺就好似玩E6300年代咁..


個價錢吾似, E6300 推出時賣 千三四, 920 要 二千幾
作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 10:26

原帖由 taihung 於 2008-11-13 10:22 發表


個價錢吾似, E6300 推出時賣 千三四, 920 要 二千幾


借喻借錯野..應該係...同Q6600個年代差唔多姐...話晒都係4核u 第一粒4核..同新世代4核
作者: ipchipang    時間: 2008-11-13 10:28

waiting for I7
作者: makwai    時間: 2008-11-13 10:31

都係要等多少少時間先得,要2千多...等佢平d先算...
作者: landcruiser    時間: 2008-11-13 10:42

原帖由 makwai 於 2008-11-13 10:31 發表
都係要等多少少時間先得,要2千多...等佢平d先算...

平條輪咩 除非AMD比到壓力煙頭啦
作者: reXxx    時間: 2008-11-13 10:43

咁都抽唔贏i7收得皮啦
作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 10:46

QX係咪應該仲要企硬個價....見人見智

人地最低級別既i7 920...都開始放佢一條小直路
作者: yingfai08    時間: 2008-11-13 11:50

i7真不錯!
作者: OSIRIS_ETERNAL    時間: 2008-11-13 11:51

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 12:10

原帖由 OSIRIS_ETERNAL 於 2008-11-13 11:51 發表

QX系不嬲都企硬,唔會減只會FADEOUT


P3 1.3Gghz...P4 EE...QX6850...QX9775...有邊隻唔係FADEOUT ...隻隻都係當代極品

不降價是為了保存名聲?
作者: OSIRIS_ETERNAL    時間: 2008-11-13 12:15

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: SamLo仔    時間: 2008-11-13 12:18

原帖由 OSIRIS_ETERNAL 於 2008-11-13 12:15 發表

唔係名聲既問題,係市場策略既問題...


搵水魚
作者: chung2288    時間: 2008-11-13 19:16

i7
作者: dennis12    時間: 2008-11-14 01:12

i965 is used to replace QX9650!
作者: kim18hits    時間: 2008-11-15 02:58

$2xxx打贏$9xxx





歡迎光臨 電腦領域 HKEPC Hardware (https://h2.hkepc.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2