Board logo

標題: D3X [打印本頁]

作者: inzite    時間: 2008-11-27 07:09     標題: D3X

enjoy, these pics were up briefly on nikon usa site. So no, it's not a fake, if it is then nikon usa is faking us.







[ 本帖最後由 inzite 於 2008-11-27 07:13 編輯 ]
作者: hoho11    時間: 2008-11-27 09:07

nikon usa is trying to fake our $$$$$$$$
作者: Mace Windu    時間: 2008-11-27 11:49

Nice stuff. Time to sell D3..
作者: nakatajoe    時間: 2008-11-27 12:19

原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2008-11-27 11:49 發表
Nice stuff. Time to sell D3..

咁快   .
我等D800
作者: warrior    時間: 2008-11-27 13:22

new body
作者: 十豪    時間: 2008-11-27 13:35

原帖由 nakatajoe 於 2008-11-27 12:19 發表

咁快   .
我等D800

我依家都唔知等乜好...
等運到... 中6合彩
作者: jeffchu    時間: 2008-11-27 14:13

冇理由high end機會出得咁快
作者: Yoda    時間: 2008-11-27 15:02

I think that looks exactly as the D3 with a 24-70/2.8.
作者: samkee    時間: 2008-11-27 15:36

原帖由 jeffchu 於 2008-11-27 14:13 發表
冇理由high end機會出得咁快


有理由,出部 24MP ,但連拍得返 5fps, 1.5x crop mode 有 12MP 但連拍上返 9fps。一向D系的x機都係高像素但連拍慢。計返 D3 應該係 H 機,即係低像素高連拍。
作者: JackSchitt    時間: 2008-11-27 19:06

個頭泰國生產線要滅火裁2千幾人
另一頭又起火出部D3X?

有冇咁岩呀
作者: 寂寞的FSY    時間: 2008-11-27 19:50

原帖由 JackSchitt 於 2008-11-27 07:06 PM 發表
個頭泰國生產線要滅火裁2千幾人
另一頭又起火出部D3X?

有冇咁岩呀

高階機維持係日本造,同泰國有咩關係?
作者: T-49    時間: 2008-11-28 01:49

原帖由 十豪 於 2008-11-27 13:35 發表

我依家都唔知等乜好...
等運到... 中6合彩


等畢業, 出黎做野搵錢養'家'
作者: inzite    時間: 2008-11-28 20:37

so it's official.
from nikon pro magazine.

" same body design, AF, metering and main functions as D3
- 24.5mp FX sensor
- 5:4 and DX crops
- 5fps at full resolution; DX crop shoots 10mp images at up to 7fps
- ISO 100-1600, extendable down to 50 and up to 6400
- 16 bit EXPEED processor"









[ 本帖最後由 inzite 於 2008-11-28 20:39 編輯 ]
作者: Tef    時間: 2008-11-28 20:39

still fair a distance from MF

[ 本帖最後由 Tef 於 2008-11-28 20:41 編輯 ]
作者: C.K.F.    時間: 2008-11-28 20:54

D3X 定 alpha 900 勁 ?

D3X係咪用sony的ccd/cmos ?
作者: inzite    時間: 2008-11-28 20:55

原帖由 C.K.F. 於 2008-11-28 20:54 發表
D3X 定 alpha 900 勁 ?

D3X係咪用sony的ccd/cmos ?


obviously d3x > a900, just the af will make it better.
作者: samkee    時間: 2008-11-28 22:50

5fps, not my cup of tea
作者: Yoda    時間: 2008-11-29 00:01

What a disappointment!  ISO to 6400 only.  Looks like same performance as D300/90.

I hope they have 2G of buffer.  That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.

I would get one immediately if it has better than 1 ev ISO performance than D300.
作者: zeroken    時間: 2008-11-29 01:03

原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 00:01 發表
What a disappointment!  ISO to 6400 only.  Looks like same performance as D300/90.

I hope they have 2G of buffer.  That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.

I would get one immediately if it has bett ...

應該係同A900同一粒SENSOR..咁高像素..ISO6400算吾錯.如果ISO6400都好OK架話...
不過像素同ISO好似都可以2者取得好平衡.至少我覺得5DMK2係咁.高像素得黎又高ISO表現好
作者: Mace Windu    時間: 2008-11-29 01:19

原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-11-29 01:03 發表

應該係同A900同一粒SENSOR..咁高像素..ISO6400算吾錯.如果ISO6400都好OK架話...
不過像素同ISO好似都可以2者取得好平衡.至少我覺得5DMK2係咁.高像素得黎又高ISO表現好


It said exclusive sensor in thar article, but of course, that can just be marketing speech.
作者: Mace Windu    時間: 2008-11-29 01:22

原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 00:01 發表
What a disappointment!  ISO to 6400 only.  Looks like same performance as D300/90.

I hope they have 2G of buffer.  That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.

I would get one immediately if it has bett ...


I am not exactly sure what to make of this.  The max ISO is actually 1600 extendable to 6400. While I pretty seldom use ISO beyond 3200 on my D3, I am not exactly sure if D3X can produce as good an image on ISO 1600.

But then again, the only time I really need to get to such high ISO is when I am doing night portraits.
作者: Nutshell    時間: 2008-11-29 02:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Yoda    時間: 2008-11-29 22:44

High ISO and high pixel density are needed for birding, especially in HK.  In places like Australia, Southern California and New Zealand I think daylight is about 2 EV higher than an average HK day.  In addition, HK birds are usually more far away, which means I have to use TCs.

Even this afternoon I was shooting at ISO2000 with a D3, 500 f4 VR with 1.7TC.   To get enough DOF I need to shoot at F9-10, to capture a relatively slow bird's movement I need at least 1/1000 sec shutter speed.    If I need to capture faster birds such as Kingfishers I'll need at least 1/2500 sec. shutter speed.

So you see why high ISO and high pixel density, preferably high frame rate and big buffer, are needed!

btw, I don't think it is the Sony A900 CMOS.  Sony CMOS has built in 12-bit AD.  Nikon uses 16bit.  So at least it is a highly modified A900 sensor.

[ 本帖最後由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 22:46 編輯 ]
作者: Midnighteye    時間: 2008-11-30 00:03

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽





歡迎光臨 電腦領域 HKEPC Hardware (https://h2.hkepc.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2