作者: inzite 時間: 2008-11-27 07:09 標題: D3X
enjoy, these pics were up briefly on nikon usa site. So no, it's not a fake, if it is then nikon usa is faking us.



[ 本帖最後由 inzite 於 2008-11-27 07:13 編輯 ]
作者: hoho11 時間: 2008-11-27 09:07
nikon usa is trying to fake our $$$$$$$$
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2008-11-27 11:49
Nice stuff. Time to sell D3..
作者: nakatajoe 時間: 2008-11-27 12:19
咁快
.我等D800
作者: warrior 時間: 2008-11-27 13:22
new body
作者: 十豪 時間: 2008-11-27 13:35
我依家都唔知等乜好...
等運到... 中6合彩
作者: jeffchu 時間: 2008-11-27 14:13
冇理由high end機會出得咁快
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-11-27 15:02
I think that looks exactly as the D3 with a 24-70/2.8.
作者: samkee 時間: 2008-11-27 15:36
有理由,出部 24MP ,但連拍得返 5fps, 1.5x crop mode 有 12MP 但連拍上返 9fps。一向D系的x機都係高像素但連拍慢。計返 D3 應該係 H 機,即係低像素高連拍。
作者: JackSchitt 時間: 2008-11-27 19:06
個頭泰國生產線要滅火裁2千幾人
另一頭又起火出部D3X?
有冇咁岩呀
作者: 寂寞的FSY 時間: 2008-11-27 19:50
高階機維持係日本造,同泰國有咩關係?
作者: T-49 時間: 2008-11-28 01:49
等畢業, 出黎做野搵錢養'家'
作者: inzite 時間: 2008-11-28 20:37
so it's official.
from nikon pro magazine.
" same body design, AF, metering and main functions as D3
- 24.5mp FX sensor
- 5:4 and DX crops
- 5fps at full resolution; DX crop shoots 10mp images at up to 7fps
- ISO 100-1600, extendable down to 50 and up to 6400
- 16 bit EXPEED processor"
[ 本帖最後由 inzite 於 2008-11-28 20:39 編輯 ]
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-28 20:39
still fair a distance from MF
[ 本帖最後由 Tef 於 2008-11-28 20:41 編輯 ]
作者: C.K.F. 時間: 2008-11-28 20:54
D3X 定 alpha 900 勁 ?
D3X係咪用sony的ccd/cmos ?
作者: inzite 時間: 2008-11-28 20:55
obviously d3x > a900, just the af will make it better.
作者: samkee 時間: 2008-11-28 22:50
5fps, not my cup of tea

作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-11-29 00:01
What a disappointment! ISO to 6400 only. Looks like same performance as D300/90.
I hope they have 2G of buffer. That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.
I would get one immediately if it has better than 1 ev ISO performance than D300.
作者: zeroken 時間: 2008-11-29 01:03
原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 00:01 發表
What a disappointment! ISO to 6400 only. Looks like same performance as D300/90.
I hope they have 2G of buffer. That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.
I would get one immediately if it has bett ...
應該係同A900同一粒SENSOR..咁高像素..ISO6400算吾錯.如果ISO6400都好OK架話...
不過像素同ISO好似都可以2者取得好平衡.至少我覺得5DMK2係咁.高像素得黎又高ISO表現好
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2008-11-29 01:19
原帖由 zeroken 於 2008-11-29 01:03 發表
應該係同A900同一粒SENSOR..咁高像素..ISO6400算吾錯.如果ISO6400都好OK架話...
不過像素同ISO好似都可以2者取得好平衡.至少我覺得5DMK2係咁.高像素得黎又高ISO表現好
It said exclusive sensor in thar article, but of course, that can just be marketing speech.
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2008-11-29 01:22
原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 00:01 發表
What a disappointment! ISO to 6400 only. Looks like same performance as D300/90.
I hope they have 2G of buffer. That'll be good for maybe 10 sec. burst.
I would get one immediately if it has bett ...
I am not exactly sure what to make of this. The max ISO is actually 1600 extendable to 6400. While I pretty seldom use ISO beyond 3200 on my D3, I am not exactly sure if D3X can produce as good an image on ISO 1600.
But then again, the only time I really need to get to such high ISO is when I am doing night portraits.
作者: Nutshell 時間: 2008-11-29 02:12
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-11-29 22:44
High ISO and high pixel density are needed for birding, especially in HK. In places like Australia, Southern California and New Zealand I think daylight is about 2 EV higher than an average HK day. In addition, HK birds are usually more far away, which means I have to use TCs.
Even this afternoon I was shooting at ISO2000 with a D3, 500 f4 VR with 1.7TC. To get enough DOF I need to shoot at F9-10, to capture a relatively slow bird's movement I need at least 1/1000 sec shutter speed. If I need to capture faster birds such as Kingfishers I'll need at least 1/2500 sec. shutter speed.
So you see why high ISO and high pixel density, preferably high frame rate and big buffer, are needed!
btw, I don't think it is the Sony A900 CMOS. Sony CMOS has built in 12-bit AD. Nikon uses 16bit. So at least it is a highly modified A900 sensor.
[ 本帖最後由 Yoda 於 2008-11-29 22:46 編輯 ]
作者: Midnighteye 時間: 2008-11-30 00:03
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

