作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 16:41 標題: headache. need a prime at 50mm
got 30mm f1.4 and 85mm f1.4. now i need 50mm prime lens. but which one should i get
ZF 50mm f1.4
ZF MP 50mm f2
nikon AF-S 50mm f1.4
sigma 50mm f1.4
nikon AF 60mm F2.8
nikon AIS 55mm micro
i need sharpness and creamy bokeh~
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 16:52
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-11-11 16:41 發表
got 30mm f1.4 and 85mm f1.4. now i need 50mm prime lens. but which one should i get![]()
ZF 50mm f1.4
ZF MP 50mm f2
nikon AF-S 50mm f1.4
sigma 50mm f1.4
nikon AF 60mm F2.8
nikon AIS 55mm micro
...
ZEISS!!!
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 16:55
which one sin ~
MP50 or 50f.14作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 17:12
i am looking at 50 1.7 recently... haha...
作者: cainester 時間: 2008-11-11 17:15
Of cos 50/1.4
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 17:22
1.4's Dof is very thin, i dont use it most of the time. i use f2 onwards. so f 1.4/f2 matters not
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 17:23
is that m42 lens ? i dont recall seeing f1.7 as new stock.
作者: Nutshell 時間: 2008-11-11 17:24
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 17:38
C/Y mount...
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 17:44
you got a adaptor to change to f mount ?
this is interesting :
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 17:57
i don't know but P50 1.7 is a very sharp lens from the reviews... even wide open
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 18:12
原帖由 initials 於 2008-11-11 17:57 發表
i don't know but P50 1.7 is a very sharp lens from the reviews... even wide open![]()
personally im not a big fan of ultra thin dof. so i only look at f2.8-8 performace
zeiss 50.4 seems quite nice in that range.
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 20:42
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-11-11 18:12 發表
personally im not a big fan of ultra thin dof. so i only look at f2.8-8 performace![]()
zeiss 50.4 seems quite nice in that range.![]()
seems you have an answer in your mind already!
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 20:54
no la, i need to see more samples. like the ZF 85mm f1.4 i regrert buying. the AFD is slightly better in terms of IQ and yet it has AF
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 21:05
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-11-11 20:54 發表
no la, i need to see more samples. like the ZF 85mm f1.4 i regrert buying. the AFD is slightly better in terms of IQ and yet it has AF![]()
what's the problem with ZF 85.4?
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-11-11 21:18
陰公,要數MTF既話,成皮野支NOCT 58/1.2俾支幾百蚊貨仔既50/1.8砌低...
但係老實講,我都唔係好信MTF
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 21:33
very loose wide open, not just my copy, alot od c-hing also have the same results.
go to dc house
i dont either. any suggestion?
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-11-11 21:46
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-11-11 21:33 發表
very loose wide open, not just my copy, alot od c-hing also have the same results.![]()
go to dc house
i dont either. any suggestion?![]()
睇實拍,同埋聽d老前輩既意見
老實講我自己唔係nikon人,但都係晌一位我自己好尊敬既nikon老前輩口中得知NOCT 58/1.2夜之眼既由來,加上晌網上面搵過既一d資料同實拍,呢支鏡並唔係MTF graph所講既咁差
而且,睇MTF既話,A16都可以砌低好多鏡,但事實又並唔係咁
作者: initials 時間: 2008-11-11 21:53
i use C/Y > EOS adaptor...
i think i will love the output of this combination...

作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 21:56
原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-11-11 21:46 發表
睇實拍,同埋聽d老前輩既意見
老實講我自己唔係nikon人,但都係晌一位我自己好尊敬既nikon老前輩口中得知NOCT 58/1.2夜之眼既由來,加上晌網上面搵過既一d資料同實拍,呢支鏡並唔係MTF graph所講既咁差
而且,睇MTF既話,A16都可以砌低好多鏡,但事實又並唔係咁
i also notice that. but 58 1.2 is $3000+......USD
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-11-11 21:58
老前輩話我聽,夜之眼最強既地方,就係夜晚對住粒燈炟,影出黎就係一粒燈炟
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-11-11 22:09
too bad it was discontinued in 97.
作者: platinum 時間: 2008-11-12 02:53
樓主買AFS 50 1.4 啦, 9 blade
作者: JackSchitt 時間: 2008-11-12 04:57
很認真的不是笑話
買新版菜鏡不如搵支舊版原廠銀嘴
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-11-12 09:03
The sharpest 50mm is probably the Ai-S 50/1.8 (made in Japan one, not the later Made in China version).
It has a very flat field curvature too, so edge sharpness is good even for FX.
The Noct is very good for portrait too, bokeh is very nice. Too bad it cost so much now!
作者: 白白 時間: 2008-11-12 13:26
平低玩 af 50.8 e 枝野好sharp


