作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-15 09:36 標題: 【Valentine's ♥ Date】Lilam
全輯在：
http://www.purplestory.com/gallery/valentines_date/
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-15 10:17
唔知點解總係有一張半張先對焦後構圖, 個頭唔中焦咁... 但隻腳又好sharp, 乜多點對焦真係咁冇用咩?
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2009-2-15 10:17 編輯 ]
作者: bobbylwl 時間: 2009-2-15 10:58
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-15 10:17 發表
唔知點解總係有一張半張先對焦後構圖, 個頭唔中焦咁... 但隻腳又好sharp, 乜多點對焦真係咁冇用咩?
我都發覺係咁
作者: keepman 時間: 2009-2-15 12:11
好 pro 既攝影作品.
作者: rickywk 時間: 2009-2-15 12:15
#9 如果地下唔係兩塊咁樣衰o既膠板會更加好
作者: kumera 時間: 2009-2-15 15:09
model個妝over左
佢本身已經唔係細眼
唔駛用假眼睫毛emphaize
何況佢仲要戴埋大眼仔
sorry,好似同攝影無關...:p
作者: ryan少 時間: 2009-2-15 15:57
我都一眼睇落去,個model d 色水...作者: 笨孩子 時間: 2009-2-15 22:46
小弟隻眼真係麻麻地 只係有靚相係我眼中出現
作者: Midnighteye 時間: 2009-2-16 00:16
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 12:39
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-15 10:17 發表
唔知點解總係有一張半張先對焦後構圖, 個頭唔中焦咁... 但隻腳又好sharp, 乜多點對焦真係咁冇用咩?
我無用多點對焦。
我諗主要原因係，好多人唔會出呢 d 技術上不完美的相，但我會選出來。因為我著重的是那一刻的感覺，有些感覺就只有在那一刻出現，之後你要模特兒再擺也擺不出來。與其選擇技術上的百分百準確和完美，我更著重感覺的表達。
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 12:39
原帖由 rickywk 於 2009-2-15 12:15 發表
#9 如果地下唔係兩塊咁樣衰o既膠板會更加好
我有諗過執走佢，不過都是算了。
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 12:40
原帖由 Midnighteye 於 2009-2-16 00:16 發表
咦係唔係九龍塘黎..?
拍得好好
又偷下師先
不錯，是九龍塘。
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 12:45
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 12:39 發表
我無用多點對焦。
我諗主要原因係，好多人唔會出呢 d 技術上不完美的相，但我會選出來。因為我著重的是那一刻的感覺，有些感覺就只有在那一刻出現，之後你要模特兒再擺也擺不出來。與其選擇技術上的百分百準確和完美，我更著重感覺的表達。
所以我咪話多D準確對焦點係有好處, 起碼減少因對錯焦而令氣氛良好0既相多添不必要0既錯誤...
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 12:59
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 12:45 發表
所以我咪話多D準確對焦點係有好處, 起碼減少因對錯焦而令氣氛良好0既相多添不必要0既錯誤...
我只用一點.. 我唔信部機幫我揀...
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 13:55
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 12:59 發表
我只用一點.. 我唔信部機幫我揀...
@_@... 你可以自己揀...@_@
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 14:01
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 13:55 發表
@_@... 你可以自己揀...@_@
以前我都會，而家我懶得轉黎轉去。
作者: 清風浮雲 時間: 2009-2-17 14:36
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 14:01 發表
以前我都會，而家我懶得轉黎轉去。
係咪影得相耐左個人自然就會咁架呢?
作者: De_N_N_iS 時間: 2009-2-17 14:37
原帖由 清風浮雲 於 2009-2-17 14:36 發表
係咪影得相耐左個人自然就會咁架呢?
你講緊自己啊..
不過我覺得 LILAM 幾上鏡的...
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 14:45
好有趣0既話題...
可能花一兩日去構思, 籌備攝影活動,
花上數小時去後製...
卻懶得花兩三秒切換對焦點...
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2009-2-17 14:46 編輯 ]
作者: De_N_N_iS 時間: 2009-2-17 14:53
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 14:45 發表
好有趣0既話題...
可能花一兩日去構思, 籌備攝影活動,
花上數小時去後製...
卻懶得花兩三秒切換對焦點...
因為中間點最順手...又唔會走黎走去......有時都唔知轉左去邊點...
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 14:53
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 14:45 發表
好有趣0既話題...
可能花一兩日去構思, 籌備攝影活動,
花上數小時去後製...
卻懶得花兩三秒切換對焦點...
你換得黎，個模特兒的表情已經轉左‥‥
You are totally missing the point.
[ 本帖最後由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 14:54 編輯 ]
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 14:54
原帖由 De_N_N_iS 於 2009-2-17 14:53 發表
因為中間點最順手...又唔會走黎走去......有時都唔知轉左去邊點...
咪就係，有時撞到佢，自己轉左，到影果陣，反而轉左唔知去邊點，搞得黎，成個感覺又已經唔同左‥‥
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 14:58
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 14:53 發表
你換得黎，個模特兒的表情已經轉左‥‥
You are totally missing the point.
i have an idea of the composition first, and then do the setting in camera or lighting needed
finally ask the model to do the posture...
what point do i miss?
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2009-2-17 15:02 編輯 ]
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 15:02
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 14:58 發表
i have an idea of the composition first, and then do the setting in camera or lighting needed
finally ask the model to do the posture...
what point do i miss?
Sacrificing technical accuracy for art.
I do not put technical accuracy as something in my top priority. These are not commercial projects. And you cannot always ask a model to give you the exact posture you want, sometimes it's something that they are doing subconsiciously, and more often than not it is those things that make or break the photo.
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 15:07
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 15:02 發表
Sacrificing technical accuracy for art.
I do not put technical accuracy as something in my top priority. These are not commercial projects. And you cannot always ask a model to give you the exact p ...
haha, i just think the technical accuracy can make the work we do perfect... of course i do appreciate the idea of some of your work... it's always in my mind that "that would be a perfect shot if it was focused correctly"
on the other hand, my situation is even worse than you... my models are usually normal girl, they have no idea about portraits... i used to ask them to show me the best posture they can do... finally they just stand there if i don't give them instructions...
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2009-2-17 15:11 編輯 ]
作者: De_N_N_iS 時間: 2009-2-17 15:16
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 14:58 發表
i have an idea of the composition first, and then do the setting in camera or lighting needed
finally ask the model to do the posture...
what point do i miss?
其實呢個都係習慣既問題..............
中間點一定係最準同最快MA..同埋而家好多機同鏡都有得 AF/MF LOCK......所以對左再轉..我覺得都OK啦..
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 15:22
原帖由 De_N_N_iS 於 2009-2-17 15:16 發表
其實呢個都係習慣既問題..............
中間點一定係最準同最快MA..同埋而家好多機同鏡都有得 AF/MF LOCK......所以對左再轉..我覺得都OK啦..
haha, when you shoot at large aperture... that would be difficult
作者: De_N_N_iS 時間: 2009-2-17 15:24
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 15:22 發表
haha, when you shoot at large aperture... that would be difficult
係.........
作者: Mace Windu 時間: 2009-2-17 15:30
原帖由 initials 於 2009-2-17 15:07 發表
haha, i just think the technical accuracy can make the work we do perfect... of course i do appreciate the idea of some of your work... it's always in my mind that "that would be a perfect shot if it ...
Yes, but I still would not make it my top priority. I could have thrown away the selected photos and published the others that are more technically correct. But I didn't. Life is always about choices. And this is how I make mine. Your milege may vary.
"And I think, right there and then, she realized none of us is perfect forever." -- The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.
[ 本帖最後由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 15:30 編輯 ]
作者: initials 時間: 2009-2-17 15:37
原帖由 Mace Windu 於 2009-2-17 15:30 發表
Yes, but I still would not make it my top priority. I could have thrown away the selected photos and published the others that are more technically correct. But I didn't. Life is always about choice ...
anyway, i just want to express the use of good focusing system...
if focus is really not a matter... go MF or never try to rescue photos by sharpening
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2009-2-17 15:50 編輯 ]
作者: CMFAM 時間: 2009-2-17 18:55
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 寶寶兒 時間: 2009-2-25 02:32
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽